I use both bitmap and vector and hate having to switch as I work)). Personally if Pixelmator team were to take Exp 3.3 as the basis and create their version I’d be delighted but by the same token would prefer vectors in Pixelmator first. If you’re a student you can get the sequel (Studio 2) for free using the Dreamspark program too but it’s not as good. I like using it in the same way I like using Pixelmator – both feel like playtime + it’s free. May or may not work – the Silverlight side is a bit iffey on a mac, but it’s the most beautiful and playful vector app I’ve worked with. Consider me successfully again – also – if you like vector tools but not Illustrator, which I’m no huge fan of as it feels like artistry mixed with accountancy, do a search on Wikipedia for Creature House Expression 3.3 and scroll down to where it says download links. 14 years I don’t dislike the idea of Vectormator per se, happy to see what Team Pix would do with such a thing from a theoretical point of view.īut I also want 1.5 NOW!!! So: no distractions □ I know it’s sunny but Back To – Sorry, I know you guys are busy and working hard. Irrespective of my desires, I’d like to thank the Pixelmator team for their stirling work and I look forward to seeing what Spider brings. I believe that having a warp transform available (more flexible than the current ‘distort’), some on-canvas tools for accomplishing liquify-like effects and something like a patch tool and healing brush, would be useful (well, it would help with doing some photo manipulation effects). Other niceties would be the ability to manipulate (and add) channels, the ability to pull in layers (or groups) as additional image inputs in filters and the ability to define progressive (and thus non-CI) filters so an industrious person could implement things like texturing algorithms (such as image analogies) although I appreciate that would be a fair amount of work. An analogue of adjustment layers could then be accomplished simply by putting all the layers to be adjusted inside a group and attaching a filter (or stack of filters) to that group. That would make it a bit more general than the fixed options you get with PS and, I think, would leverage Core Image’s capabilities quite nicely. I’m hoping that the ‘layer styles’ support will be in the form of non-destructive ‘stacks’ of filters able to be applied to any layer (or layer group should they be implemented).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |